Skip to main content

Yogi Adityanath as UP chief minister

        Long back before UP elections I have read some FB page which was titled as 'Yogi Adityanath as UP CM'. I guess he was no doubt a strong contender for the post, given his organizing skills. We cannot judge organizing skills when situation was tailor-made for BJP. Adityanath has been winning in his constituency from 1998, that too a Loksabha constituency, and it includes a patch of years when things were not so easy for BJP in UP. So clearly he has better leadership skills than other BJP leaders which are basically boats that have risen on strong tide. So seen from the criteria of choosing a leader with proven leadership mantle, he is a good choice. The discomfort one feels for this choice is when one considers what will be the priorities of him, seen in the light of intentions that his past reveals. Please note that I am not saying 'spiritual personality shouldn't be politically active', what I am saying is when CM of any state seems to have some disputable (not corrupt, but something on which there is no wider agreement) agenda because of his past actions and thoughts, then it is a cause of concern. 
        It is quite likely that I am reading things wrongly. Hindu vote consolidation might have occurred for the same agenda which Adityanath represents and if such is the case, then he is truly a representative choice. But we must say that he becomes right choice in this case by 'majoritarian' argument, and there is still scope to differ.  
       This is not first time BJP has appointed a supposedly spiritual personality as CM. Uma Bharati was one such prior experiment and one can say that it failed. 
        There is some confusion in the mind of person observing distantly what happened in UP. The confusion can be stated as follows: Did BJP win because it was able to convince voters with development agenda ot did it win by consolidating Hindu votes, by erasing caste lines and firmly drawing lines of religions. I think Adityanath's appointment reveals that invoking voters on the basis of religious identities (subtly or symbolically in public, and blatantly in informal social media channels) played a great role in BJP success. 
        As Ashutosh Varshney pointed out in his recent Indian Express column, BJP will have (either by compulsion or by choice) a two pronged path: a Hindu identity laden one and a development rhetoric one. It will be interesting to see how new UP CM trades. I expect that symbolic changes aiming at identity consolidation will have major role and it is quite likely that they will over-shadow development agenda. One can go further and say that BJP will try to develop further on long-standing issue of Ram Mandir, which was never explicitly recognised and was never explicitly withdrawn. It seems eerily similar to transition from Mulayam to Kalyansingh before 1992, though I still believe that probability that such course of action will repeat itself is much less likely. 
       I personally think that one cannot be a spiritual personality when one dabbles in social action. There is no precedence for such actions anywhere in Hindu philosophy. The role of sages was contemplation and production of 'knowledge' and may be 'nudging' the political leadership, but never of to be a leader. This is very similar to Plato's conception of 'Philosopher King', though it is debatable how close Adityanath or Uma Bharati were to be called a philosopher. Plainly put, political leadership requires some opportune selfish behaviour which is diagonally opposite to a spiritual mindset. Spiritual person can be interested in social happenings, but cannot be interested in becoming an active agent of change. That's why I am uneasy with having so called spiritual personalities becoming socially active personalities. I think it shows some fundamental contradiction, nonetheless they become politically effective agents of change. 
      I think BJP is the best political alternative in India right now, but I can never conform to religious identity based, pride driven discourse which they cunningly use (that's another point of contention, that they never embrace it and never give it up!). Adityanath as UP CM is something I would never support, though I wish him good luck and I wish rapid development phase for UP, for which they have been waiting for so long.     
     I think Adityanath becoming CM will have impact on Ram Mandir issue, it will be a big surprise if it won't. So some points on Ram Mandir issue are in order: I never believed that Babur never destroyed the temple. I think Muslim invasion had motives of wealth and power accumulation  within broader religious thrust. But I do not see any merit in movement for temple. The temple can be constructed by acceptable mode of persuasion where owners/current claimants of such land sells/transfers the plot to highest bidder in mutual agreement and that buyer/new controller decides to have a temple there. Agreeing to what was the history is different thing than zeal to undo some historical action now, especially when it lacks wider materialistic benefits. It is an emotional issue without any concurrent society level material benefits and it is best for the nation if resources of social leaders are not wasted on such issue. 
    Hopefully a rational discourse will prevail over the emotional one!  

Popular posts from this blog

A week of demonetization

Now, it has been week when we woke up to a realization that ₹ 500 and $ 1000 notes that many of us had are no more a legal tender. After the frenzied 1st day, when everyone kept strategizing about their response, 2nd day onwards, we are witnessing long queues in bank branches and ATMs. There are reports of 25 deaths in the country during the week which are reported to be due to demonetization decision. Market has been in the red, though on the first day, after collapsing for about more than 1500 points, it recovered back strongly. But then 14th and 15th November, market has collapsed further. (As I am writing this on 16th November morning around 9 AM, market is up by about 150 points.) Newspapers have been reporting about long queues and slow sales. Somehow, there is no way that one can credibly verify what is happening in different parts of the country. Social media is abuzz with mainly support and little critique. That’s the grip of current government on minds. I think politically…

चलनबदली योजनेच्या परिणामांबाबत काही हायपोथेसिस

पुढे दिलेल्या लिंक्स आणि थोडेसे विश्लेषण, त्यांत आलेली अनेक मते, शक्यता ह्यांच्यातून काही हायपोथेसिस मिळतील अशा दृष्टीने मी त्यांच्याकडे बघतो. ठाम काही बोलण्यासाठी लागणारा डेटा आणि clarity इतक्या पटकन येणार नाही (मला तरी) असं मला वाटतं.
१.प्रत्यक्षात छापलेले जुने रद्द चलन ( किंमत सुमारे १४ ट्रिलीयन रुपये) आणि चलनबदलीच्या कालावधीत बँकात जमा होणारे जुने रद्द चलन ह्यांच्यात्तील फरक हा रिझर्व्ह बँकेला फायदा ठरेल. कायद्याने तो सरकारला उपलब्ध होईल. सरकार त्याचा वापर करू शकते. अनेक निरीक्षकांच्या मते एन.पी.ए.च्या समस्येने ग्रासलेल्या बँकांना re-capitalize करायला हा फायदा वापरता येईल. रिझर्व्ह बँकेचे माजी गव्हर्नर डी. सुब्बाराव ह्यांनी असे करणे चुकीचे ठरेल असं म्हटलं आहे. (त्याच वक्तव्यात चलनबदलीचे फायदे हे तोट्याहून अधिक आहेत असेही त्यांनी म्हटले आहे.) हा फरक कशामुळे निर्माण होईल? ह्याचे लोकप्रिय उत्तर आहे कि काळ्या पैशामुळे. बेहिशोबी चलन हे बँकात बदलायला आणले जाणार नाही किंवा आणणे अशक्य असेल आणि त्यामुळे त्याची किंमत विरून जाईल. सुमारे ३ ट्रिलीयन रुपये एवढ्या किंमतीचा फरक यावा असा अंदाज आहे. …

डॉक्टरांवरचे जमावी हल्ले आणि आपली मूलभूत विसंगती

डॉक्टरांनाचिडलेल्याजमावानेमारहाणकरण्याची, हॉस्पिटलांचेनुकसानकरण्याच्या घटना काही आत्ताच घडू लागलेल्या नाहीत. मीपहिल्यांदाअशाघटनेबाबतऐकलंतेआनंददिघेह्यांच्याअपघातीमृत्यूनंतरसिंघनियाहॉस्पिटलचीनासधूसझालीतेव्हा. हीनासधूसकरणाऱ्यांनाकायशासनझालेहेमलामाहितीनाही, पणझालेअसावेअसेवाटतनाही. पोलीस, राजकीयपक्षआणिहॉस्पिटलह्यांनीआउटऑफकोर्ट amicable settlement नेहाप्रश्न (?) सोडवलाअसण्याचीशक्यताजास्तआहे. मागच्याआठवड्यातधुळेयेथेडॉ. रोहनम्हामुणकरह्यांनाझालेलीमारहाणआणित्यानंतरअशाचस्वरूपाच्याअजूनकाहीघटनाह्यामुळेसरकारी डॉक्टरांनीवैयक्तिकस्तरावरसंपपुकारला